ybenkh
November 23, 2022, 3:22pm
1
Hello,
We have a use case where our data model is not able to use a common template because some part of the data model is nullable.
Let me show you what are our use cases.
Here is our template . (14.6 KB)
Our first data model which works perfectly.
{ "person1": { "name": "P1" }, "person2": { "name": "P2" } }
The second one which fails due to the “name” property which is not present.
{ "person1": { "name": "P1" }, "person2": null }
(Sorry haven’t been able to upload a JSON file).
Can GroupDocs assembly handle such a use case?
Kind regards.
1 Like
@ybenkh
We are investigating this scenario. Your investigation ticket ID is ASSEMBLYJAVA-31 .
@ybenkh
This use-case is a perfect fit for using DocumentAssemblyOptions.ALLOW_MISSING_MEMBERS as follows:
DocumentAssembler assembler = new DocumentAssembler();
assembler.setOptions(DocumentAssemblyOptions.ALLOW_MISSING_MEMBERS);
assembler.assembleDocument(...);
ybenkh
November 23, 2022, 7:52pm
4
Wow, thanks a lot for your prompt reply.
I’ve just tested it and it works like a charm.
But I did not found anything related to that option in the documentation.
Did I miss something?
Thanks again.
Regards.
1 Like
@ybenkh
We will create a relevant documentation article and share with you.
@ybenkh
Please take a look at this documentation article.
ybenkh
November 29, 2022, 8:44am
7
Great! I just read it and sounds good.
IMO, the last sentence should have been highlighted:
However, if DocumentAssemblyOptions.ALLOW_MISSING_MEMBERS
is applied, the assembler treats access to such a field as a null literal, so no exception is thrown and simply no value is written to the report then.
Regards.
1 Like
@ybenkh
Thanks for the feedback. We’ll look into it.